Trump 2.0, The EU-US Relationship at a Crossroads
Much of the impact of the new Trump Administration on Europe will depend on how the balance of power within the US plays out between the President and key corporate leaders, of Big Tech in particular.
The pattern in recent weeks has been that top CEOs go and pay tribute to the incoming President, with huge losses to their own public image globally
Mario Monti
On January 16, 2025, IEP@BU Honorary President Mario Monti participated in the digital event The EU-US Relationship at a Crossroads, co-organized by Sciences Po and the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE).
The conversation was moderated by Natacha Valla (Sciences Po School of Management and Impact), with speakers Olivier Blanchard (PIIE), Jason Furman (PIIE), and Mario Monti.
Below is a note that Mario Monti prepared as background for his comments.
The EU-US Relationship at a Crossroads
by Mario Monti
Much of the impact of the new Trump Administration on Europe will depend on how the balance of power within the US plays out between the President and key corporate leaders, of Big Tech in particular.
The pattern in recent weeks has been that top CEOs go and pay (tribute, donations plus some impressive corporate U-turns - eg, Meta abolishing its moderation processes, Black Rock and many others reneging on their ESG policies) to the incoming President, with huge losses to their own public image globally.
If in due course the Administration does meet the expectations of these influential converts, we will probably see the implications in terms of retaliations when the EU imposes fines or commitments to US-based companies for violations of EU competition or other rules in their operations in the EU.
This would make the very functioning of the EU highly vulnerable to arbitrary US decisions. Similarly, big US-based multinationals could persuade the Administration to undermine the OECD agreement on the minimum effective rate of 15% on corporate profits.
In perspective, such a multinationals-dominated foreign economic policy of the Trump Administration would indicate the interest of both US corporate power and political power in the White House to join forces to disarticulate what remains of multilateral governance in the world, to prevail in the global economy through unilateral interventions or at most bilateral agreements.
Seen from the EU, the impact of the new Trump Administration may take place via several channels :
- A new form of capitalism and its relationship with politics (including the above) : given the historical proximity between the development of contemporary capitalism in the US and the EU and the presence of most large companies on both sides of the Atlantic, what happens in the US in the next few years is likely to influence the culture and behaviour of the European business community to a large extent. That may include its opinions and strategies on the very issue of EU integration.
- Antitrust and competition policy. In the last 25 years the US and EU competition authorities - although with some moments of tensions with each other on specific cases of mergers or abuses of dominance - have by and large shared a common culture, through which they have achieved growing transatlantic convergence, much to the benefit of the corporate world.
In addition, they have been working effectively to spread that culture, and the operating methods to implement it, throughout much of the world, including China to some extent.
It is worth examining what the consequences would be - transatlantically and globally - of a potential shift by the Trump Administration into a more "transactional", discretionary, and ad hoc modus operandi, which would give a larger role to the political congeniality between a business sector or a specific company and the Administration.
Some likely implications, domestic and transatlantic, can be easily anticipated. There might also be some effects on the US economy (lower growth, higher inflation, higher interest rates).
- Trump and European defence. The one area where I believe the announced intents of President Trump may well be ultimately beneficial to European integration is defence.
The EU should indeed considerably increase, in terms of amounts and coordination, its efforts on defense and security.
The reason is twofold: a) all recent American administrations have insisted on the need for Europe to bear a fairer share of the burden for its defense, although in the broader context of NATO; b) in terms of its foreign policy, the US is characterized by increasing variability, so that it will become more risky to have to rely too much on volatile policy orientations of the US.
- Trump 1, Trump 2, and European (dis)integration. Some of the circumstances outlined above might have - or indeed have - occurred during the first Trump Administration. I will briefly say why in my view the risk of disintegration at that time was smaller than today and why it only materialised to a rather small extent. Today the risk is greater and the defences are weaker.
Watch the Full Debate
Mario Monti
Mario Monti is the honorary president of the Institute for European Policymaking at Bocconi University. He is a former Prime Minister of Italy, a former European Commissioner, and he is also a Senator for Life. He has been the Rector and President of Bocconi University.
IEP@BU Events
Which EU Defense Spending to Address the War in Ukraine and Russia?
January 30, 2:30 PM-3:30 PM - ONLINE
A Conversation Based on the IEP@BU Policy Brief: Before Vegetius – Critical Questions for European Defense
There is broad consensus on the need for the EU to increase its defense spending and strengthen its military capabilities. What remains less clear, however, is the ultimate objective of such an effort.
Should the EU’s top priority be to support Ukraine’s resistance in the short term, or to build a robust deterrence—primarily against Russia—over the medium term? Can it effectively pursue both goals simultaneously? And when it comes to the eastern front, what security approach should the EU adopt?
Drawing on the recent IEP@BU Policy Brief Before Vegetius: Critical Questions for European Defense, this discussion will explore how the EU can address these pressing strategic challenges.
Speakers:
Olesya Vinhas de Souza, a leading defense analyst with expertise in Russian security issues and cybersecurity at the NATO Defense Council.
Andrea Gilli, lecturer in Strategic Studies at the University of St Andrews, IEP@BU research fellow, and co-author of the IEP@BU Policy Brief Before Vegetius: Critical Questions for European Defense.
Stefano Feltri, IEP@BU communication advisor.
Please, REGISTER HERE
When Will Germany Be Back?
February 24, 2:30 PM-3:30 PM - ONLINE
The day after the federal snap election, we will explore the European consequences of the vote against the backdrop of Germany’s economic challenges.
In November 2024, a coalition government collapsed when Chancellor Olaf Scholz dismissed Finance Minister Christian Lindner, highlighting Germany’s ongoing struggle to balance its political ambitions, renewed security priorities, and stringent budget rules.
For the first time in decades, the European Union faces a dual leadership vacuum in Germany and France—two pivotal member states in EU politics.
Meanwhile, geopolitical and economic challenges continue to escalate: the war in Ukraine demands unwavering commitment from the EU's leading states and institutions, and Donald Trump’s return to power introduces uncertainty to global economic and multilateral governance.
Join us as we debrief the European implications of the German federal elections with Wolfgang Munchau and Diana Pieper.
Speakers:
Wolfgang Munchau is one of the foremost commentators on EU economic and political affairs. He is the director of Eurointelligence and the author of the recent book Kaput: The End of the German Miracle.
Diana Pieper is a Berlin-based journalist with Die Welt and an IEP@BU Media Fellow.
Stefano Feltri, IEP@BU communication advisor, will moderate the conversation.
Please, REGISTER HERE
The IEP@BU Mission
Founded by Bocconi University and Institute Javotte Bocconi, the Institute for European Policymaking @ Bocconi University combines the analytic rigor of a research institute, the policy impact of a think tank, and the facts-based effort of raising public opinion’s awareness about Europe through outreach activities. The Institute, fully interdisciplinary, intends to address the multi-fold obstacles that usually stand between the design of appropriate policies and their adoption, with particular attention to consensus building and effective enforcement.
The Institute’s mission is to conduct, debate and disseminate high-quality research on the major policy issues facing Europe, and the EU in particular, its Member States and its citizens, in a rapidly changing world.
It is independent from any business or political influence.
The IEP@BU Management Council
Catherine De Vries, Dean for International Affairs and Professor of Political Science at Bocconi University
Daniel Gros, IEP@BU Director
Sylvie Goulard, IEP@BU vice-President, Professor of Practice in Global affairs at SDA Bocconi School of Management
Silvia Colombo, IEP@BU Deputy Director
Carlo Altomonte, Associate Professor at Bocconi University and Associate Dean for Stakeholder Engagement Programs at SDA Bocconi School of Management
Valentina Bosetti, professor of Environmental and Climate Change Economics at Bocconi University
Elena Carletti, Dean for Research and Professor of Finance at Bocconi University
Eleanor Spaventa, Professor of European Union Law at Bocconi Law School
 |
|